Home arrow Home arrow Success?
Success? PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 7
PoorBest 
Written by Ron Pyle   
Monday, 24 August 2009
According to Ron Pyle, ASA president, government and free enterprise do not and should not mix. Ron comments on the reported “success” of the federal government’s CARS program, better known as “Cash for Clunkers.”



The federally funded CARS program, better known as “Cash for Clunkers” is scheduled to end Aug. 24 at midnight. It is being widely publicized as a huge “success,” and reports indicated some 700,000 vehicles were sold through the program.

There is a great deal of discussion about whether or not the dealers who sold those vehicles will see their reimbursement. The program was woefully implemented logistically, and the last number I heard was that only 16,000 of the applications had been processed. However, there is no question that people responded to “free” money from the federal government.

If you were qualified by virtue of owning a vehicle deemed a “clunker,” as determined by the administration, you were eligible for $4,500 toward the purchase of a new vehicle deemed more “acceptable” under the guidelines of the program.

In my opinion, this was another grand experiment that once again proves that government and free enterprise do not and should not mix. It is simply a transfer of wealth directed by the government to achieve an outcome that is politically expedient without any regard for the long-term implications.

My first thought when I heard about this plan, was, “Didn’t we just do something similar with housing?” How well did that turn out?

Encouraging people to purchase something on credit that they otherwise might not be able to afford is not smart. Relaxing the lending rules or providing incentives to make it easier is even dumber. But expecting responsible taxpayers to take up the slack when the natural consequences “hit the fan” as it were, pretty much takes the cake. Well, maybe not. We still have more fun to come in the guise of “health care reform.”

So, apparently “success” is measured in how much of your money the government can redirect to programs that it feels are in your best interest, or maybe it’s simply measured by the number of people who will line up for this “free” money. Either way, you can rest assured that anything this “successful” is likely to be repeated over and over.

As a small business owner, you are particularly vulnerable because you are one of the “rich” who needs to step up and pay a larger share to “do the right thing” by all those not so “fortunate” as you.

I remember my Dad sharing a personal story about the perception someone had of his success. After many long years of personal sacrifice and very hard work, my father built a good business that we were all truly proud of. One day, someone who was admiring the business told him how “lucky” he was to be so successful. He didn’t particularly appreciate the comment, and I’ll bet you know why.

If you have built a successful business and you know the true meaning of success, don’t be misled by the measurement being applied to “Cash for Clunkers.” That kind of “success” should be scrapped along with the clunkers we all paid the price for.

Ron Pyle 



LIST OF COMMENTS


1/5. Operations Manager
Written by Dustin Eckhart - Wednesday, August 26 2009

I agree 100% Ron. Cash for Clunkers is just another government aided wolf in sheep's clothing. Let's hope our elected officials do not decide to make this a permanent program!

2/5. Success?
Written by Bob Chabot - Tuesday, September 01 2009

I reviewed the results from the Car Allowance Rebate System program, available on the U.S. Department of Transportation Web site (http://www.dot.gov/affairs/2009/dot13309.htm). Ignoring the DOT’s spinning of the results, I’ll accept that the fuel economy of the vehicles traded improved 58 percent (from 15.8 to 24.9 mpg), even though 700,000 vehicles is far from a significant fraction of the total vehicle population. And yes, I understand the DOT’s claim domestic automakers reported increases in hiring, projecting 42,000 jobs ‘will be’ created or saved by year end. According to the DOT press release, all of top 10 vehicle models traded-in were manufactured by the Big 3 automakers, all of them trucks, vans or SUVs. Yet only two of the top 10 models purchases were American-made (Ford's Focus and Escape), again, the remainder being imports. In addition, the states where these buyers live hardly align with those with the hotbeds of U.S. automobile industry manufacturing – as California, Texas, New York, Florida and Illinois comprise the top 33 percent. As for the job claim, ‘will be’ is hardly certain, so perhaps ‘may be’ would be more appropriate, with a followup accounting to sort poli-spin from actual fact. Given the costs ($2.788 billion in rebates plus unpublished program administrative costs), I fail to see a reasonable ROI – financial, social or otherwise – to the taxpayers who funded it. Nor do I see any willingness to account for the negative impacts the C.A.R.S. program will have on other segments inside the auto industry, such as repairers losing the opportunity to repair vehicles they otherwise would have. Thus I am also left to wonder how the program truly helped the domestic automakers, their suppliers and those who repair automobiles in general.

3/5. Owner of Thoroughbred Transmissions& NapaAutocare Inc.
Written by Guest : Stephen Powell @003 Napa ASE Tech of the Year & past ASA Committee member - Tuesday, September 01 2009

As a Shop owner, this is a 2 sided problem, on one hand we have loyal customers with cars that are ready to be scraped , worth $500 , $4,500 is a good start for them. But most cars purchased are foreign, they could have helped the big 3, but NO !, they could of had a provision for repair, but no !, and to destroy all these vehicles, parts gone forever ! I see much higher taxes , for a long time. I'm told that app. 750,000 cars went thru this program. I am not sure that spread thru-out the entire country this will hurt any shop very much, but it will not help us at all,Stephen Powell

4/5. Success
Written by Sandy Blalock - Thursday, September 03 2009

I agree with Ron... our government has overstepped the boundaries into Free Enterprise that will make turning back a big problem. Many years ago our government in it's infinite wisdom created a well known program called "Welfare" and now our new administration has crossed the line with "Corporate Welfare". When are we going to learn if you give somebody something they did not earn or even have the possibility of earning they will never put their hand down. Our government needs to get back to governing and passing laws that prevent some of the problems created during the financial crisis and stop intervening in our constitutional right to live and work in a country that protects our rights and liberties, which includes "NO Taxation without Representation". The repercussions of this program are yet to be seen but as American Taxpayers we must demand that our President and members of Congress work to protect our rights no matter what our economic status may be. This program trampled on the rights of America's most vulnerable citizens the lower income wage earners whose hard earned tax dollars will go to paying off this debt that in my opinion is not their debt to pay. We should never allow our government to pass programs that do not have equal benefits for every American Citizen. We removed 700,000 running vehicles from America's highways that will now be reduced to scrap within 6 months time and the economic impact of that will probably never be appropriately measured.

5/5. success,yes
Written by Guest - Thursday, September 03 2009

Yes, it was successful. Anytime a car buyer can get a better car deal it is a successful for the auto buyer. Ron. the business and government has always been mixed. The government p;rograms are no better or worse that the auto dealers business.

Add Comments
Last Updated ( Monday, 24 August 2009 )
 
< Prev   Next >
Copyright © 2010 ASA Blog.  Our site is valid CSS Our site is valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional
web application development by Netstrategies